MAGA Delusions

MAGA-inspired Attack on Capitol 

Was A Despicable Act

Lack of Shame, Remorse Make Recovery Impossible for Some

By Steve Rensberry

    EDWARDSVILLE, Ill. (RPNews-OPINION) -- 1/7/2024 -- I don't care which way you try to spin it, the attack that took place at the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, was disgusting and stupid. A noble cause? A movement to "save the country" from "evil Democrats" and "woke liberals"? A spiritual awakening or prophetic occurrence? Sorry, but it was none of these, as much as the black-and-white-thinking folks who either defend or participated in it would like to think. The full report.

    There is no need to tell the story, yet again, because we all know what we saw with our own eyes. For those who still values facts over ideology, one source of data among many is the organization American Oversight, which has provided an update on the investigation and news on all of those involved, including on state and local levels. See: The January 6 U.S. Attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    But here we are in 2025, while many of us are hoping for peace and some degree of civility, when an angry, hyper-political, vengence-filled veteran like Matthew Alan Livelsberger loses it mentally and kills himself while intentionally blowing up a Tesla truck, all to make a point that we should embrace the "hegenomy" (Livelsberger's chosen word) and aggressive type of toxic, bullish masculinity represented by Trump, Musk, and Robert Kennedy Jr., showing zero empathy toward other Americans who think differently, and that Dems should be violently removed from power along with anyone else deemed a threat. Are we still living in America, a Constitutional Republic built on democratic principles and a desire to live in peace? 

    Why are people not straight up arrested and charged when they make threats of violence against others like this, like Trump himself has done? We'd be naive to think such terrorist-style leadership was not influential with Livelsberger, fueling the idolization of such behavior. Do those who voted for him have an answer? Does it matter? Do free speech rights include the right to slander someone or make death threats (direct or implied), which Trump has done repeatedly? No.

    I sometimes wonder if the entire nation is preparing to go over the edge in one big mass cultish end-it-all scenario, similar to what happened with James Warren Jones. Everyone will be gone, but it'll all be okay because they'll just be resting comfortably in heaven, or perhaps hell. Up is down. Down is up. Life is hell. Death is good. Fundamentist evangelicals believe their God thinks liberals and "woke" Americans are evil, so anything goes, right? Is that how the new Domination-At-Any Cost MAGA radicals think?

    The irony is that those making and encouraging this type of thinking appear to many of us more as bullies than tough guys. Whatever toughness they hope to project is negated by their overwhelming bigotry and phony masculinity. Like made-up and choreographed World Wide Wrestling matches, they lack integrity, emotion, and humanitarian elements. It's a show, a disingenuouis, threatening,  violent-when-necessary show that helps them get their way.

American Corrections System Keeps Growing

   PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS - 11/11/2014 - Explosive growth in the number of people on probation or parole has propelled the population of the American corrections system to more than 7.3 million, or 1 in every 31 U.S. adults, according to a recent report by the Pew Center on the States. The vast majority of these offenders live in the community, yet new data in the report finds that nearly 90 percent of state corrections dollars are spent on prisons. One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections examines the scale and cost of prison, jail, probation and parole in each of the 50 states, and provides a blueprint for states to cut both crime and spending by reallocating prison expenses to fund stronger supervision of the large number of offenders in the community.  
   Most states are facing serious budget deficits,” The Pew Center Managing Director on the States Susan Urahn said. “Every single one of them should be making smart investments in community corrections that will help them cut costs and improve outcomes.”
   In the past two decades, state general fund spending on corrections increased by more than 300 percent, outpacing other essential government services from education, to transportation and public assistance. Only Medicaid spending has grown faster. Today, corrections imposes a national taxpayer burden of $68 billion a year. Despite this increased spending, recidivism rates have remained largely unchanged.
   Research shows that strong community supervision programs for lower-risk, non-violent offenders not only cost significantly less than incarceration but, when appropriately resourced and managed, can cut recidivism by as much as 30 percent. Diverting these offenders to community supervision programs also frees up prison beds needed to house violent offenders, and can offer budget makers additional resources for other pressing public priorities.
   One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections provides a detailed look at who is in the corrections system and which states have the highest populations of offenders behind bars and in the community. Key findings include:

• One in 31 adults in America is in prison or jail, or on probation or parole. Twenty-five years ago, the rate was 1 in 77.
• Overall, two-thirds of offenders are in the community, not behind bars. 1 in 45 adults is on probation or parole and 1 in 100 is in prison or jail. The proportion of offenders behind bars versus in the community has changed very little over the past 25 years, despite the addition of 1.1 million prison beds.
• Correctional control rates are highly concentrated by race and geography: 1 in 11 black adults (9.2 percent) versus 1 in 27 Hispanic adults (3.7 percent) and 1 in 45 white adults (2.2 percent); 1 in 18 men (5.5 percent) versus 1 in 89 women (1.1 percent). The rates can be extremely high in certain neighborhoods. In one block-group of Detroit's East Side, for example, 1 in 7 adult men (14.3 percent) is under correctional control.
• Georgia, where 1 in 13 adults is behind bars or under community supervision, leads the top five states that also include Idaho, Texas, Massachusetts, Ohio and the District of Columbia.

   The report also analyzes the cost of current sentencing and corrections policies. The National Association of State Budget Officers estimates that states spent a record $51.7 billion on corrections in FY2008, or 1 in every 15 general fund dollars. Adding local, federal and other funding brings the national correctional spending total to $68 billion.
   While total correctional spending figures have been available before, new data collected by the Pew Center on the States for the report provides the first breakdown of correctional spending by prisons, probation and parole in the past seven years:

• In FY 2008, the 34 states for which data are available spent $18.65 billion on prisons (88 percent of corrections spending), but only $2.52 billion on probation and parole (12 percent).
• For eight states where 25 years of data were available, spending on prisons grew by $4.74 billion from FY 1983 to FY 2008, while probation and parole spending increased by only $652 million. This means that while prisons accounted for one-third of the population growth, they consumed 88 percent of the new corrections expenditures.
• The 33 states that were able to provide data reported spending as much as 22 times more per day to manage prison inmates than to supervise offenders in the community. The reported average inmate cost was $79 per day, or nearly $29,000 per year. The average cost of managing an offender in the community ranged from $3.42 per day for probationers to $7.47 per day for parolees, or about $1,250 to $2,750 a year.

   “Violent and career criminals need to be locked up, and for a long time. But our research shows that prisons are housing too many people who can be managed safely and held accountable in the community at far lower cost,” Pew Center on the States' Public Safety Performance Project Director Adam Gelb said. “New community supervision strategies and technologies need to be strengthened and expanded, not scaled back. Cutting them may appear to save a few dollars, but it doesn't. It will fuel the cycle of more crime, more victims, more arrests, more prosecutions, and still more imprisonment.”
   One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections provides states with a blueprint and specific case studies for strengthening their community corrections systems, saving money and reducing crime. Research-based recommendations include:

• Sort offenders by risk to public safety to determine appropriate levels of supervision;
• Base intervention programs on sound research about what works to reduce recidivism;
• Harness advances in supervision technology such as electronic monitoring and rapid-result alcohol and drug tests;
• Impose swift and certain sanctions for offenders who break the rules of their release but who do not commit new crimes; and
• Create incentives for offenders and supervision agencies to succeed, and monitor their performance. 

Source: Pew Charitable Trusts